Why Philosophy of Sport is a Difficult Topic for Philosophers


While the definition of sport is contested, there is no doubt that it involves physical exertion and performance measures. The nature of sport changes with societal trends and norms. Patterns of behaviour are what make sport what it is. This article examines the ethics of cheating in sport and the purpose of art and beauty in sport. The philosophical questions related to sport are also addressed in the article. Read on to find out why philosophy of sport is a difficult topic for philosophers to tackle.

Ethics of cheating in sport

The Ethics of Cheating in Sport is a growing conversation in our society, with many athletes attempting to manipulate the game in their favor. Modern advances in technology such as wi-fi, hidden cameras, and blue tooth have made breaking the rules easier than ever. These new developments also create new ethical problems. It is critical for young athletes to understand the consequences of cheating, and the ramifications of doing so. Read on to discover more.

While young athletes should be able to compete without cheating, too much expectation will lead them to compromise their integrity. Athletes in sports with rampant use of performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) will often feel compelled to cheat, or alter their scores intentionally to gain advantage over their opponents. However, there are methods for educating young athletes about the Ethics of Cheating in Sport and how to deal with the fallout of cheating.

Physical demands of each sport determine whether it is a sport

The Physical Demands of Each Sport (DISQ) instrument was developed to measure athletes' perceptions of the resources and demands of a sport. Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the sport context is three-dimensional. Correlations among scales indicated different dimensions of the demands. Invariance testing supported factorial invariance of the DISQ-SPORT across sport types, competitive levels, and languages.

The physical demands of a sport cannot be considered separately from its resources. The two must be assessed simultaneously. If one is too demanding, it is not a sport. For example, if a sport requires a large amount of resources, it would be unsustainable to engage in it. It may require special training, equipment, or other resources, and still not be feasible for the athlete. In any case, the sport would not be sustainable.

Philosophy of sport illuminates problems of philosophy beyond sport

A scholarly study of philosophy of sport has the potential to illuminate philosophical problems that extend beyond the discipline itself. Among the topics addressed are issues of equity in the operation of sport, genetic engineering, the commercialization of sports, and the xenophobia of modern sporting nationalism. But what does philosophy of sport have to do with social science? Let's take a look. It's not just a book of essays, as some have claimed.

Philosophical studies of sport have been largely influenced by recent events. The use of performance-enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong raised ethical questions about cheating, while the disfigurement of Oscar Pistorius's arm by a prosthesis complicated the distinction between able-bodied and disabled athletes. A philosophical analysis of sport may also shed light on philosophical questions that go beyond the physical world, such as the nature of altruism and skill. This entry proceeds in three sections: the first section introduces philosophy of sport. The second section discusses the nature and value of sports, and the third focuses on the main normative theories of sport.