This is an essay about how the lobby has successfully humanized Atiq Ahmed, an event that earlier showed how the death penalty has been employed against a victim’s family.
When Atiq Ahmed was crucified upside down at the hands of conservatives in Pakistan, the death penalty was a central part of the1 rural judiciary’s response. Islamabad was a hotbed of conservative extremism, and the death penalty was seen as a way of deterring this movement. In retaliation for the cruel act, the conservative establishment campaign against Ahmed’s family. In 2013, the then-Chief Minister of Islamabad, Khizr Khan, asked the upper court to commute the death sentence. He argued that the punishment was beyond the pale and lacked any deterrent value. Ahmed’s father, Ahmed Khan, was heartbroken at his son’s execution. He later filed a petition with the Supreme Court, asking for his son’s pardon. Despite strong objections from the right-wing judiciary and the mayor of Islamabad, the petition was approved.
Humanization of the victims and their families has been a successful strategy of the lobby in Pakistan. This strategy has been based on the idea that the death penalty is an effective deterrent and that families should be given an opportunity to grieve. Humanization has been used to create a sense of victimhood in the population, and to stoke popular sentiment against the necklace of bullets that killed Atiq Ahmed. The obliteration of the family has also been used to create an air of impunity for the guilty. The judiciary’s acquiescence to this strategy has given the lobby a cover to continue its campaign of humanization.
Humanization of the victim is a particularly effective strategy in the absence of a visible victim. Victims often lack the resources to support themselves and their families, and the death penalty can provide a sense of revenge and closure. For the conservative establishment, the death penalty is the only way to ensure that these families are not harmed again. The Dudley Group’s report “Pakistan on the Cutting Edge: A Comprehensive Analysis”2 discloses that, “The death penalty is seen as a deterrent by most of the public in Pakistan. The establishment feels that it would be difficult for an individual to be executed for a crime that he or she did not commit. There is strong public support for a sentence that meetes the criminal’s deserves.”
The death penalty has also been used to scapegoat the victim’s family. Conservative Supreme Court justices argued that the death penalty was “unjust and draconian”3 and that the punishment was based on “factual inaccuracies.”4 The death penalty has been used to create a sense of victimhood in the population, and to stoke popular sentiment against the necklace of bullets that killed Atiq Ahmed. The obliteration of the family has also been used to create an air of impunity for the guilty. This strategy has worked in part because the victim’s family is often toomarginalized to take part in the justice system.
Despite the lobby’s success in humanizing Atiq Ahmed, the death penalty still has Seeh Amin, his father-in-law, in an unfavorable light. Amin has been labeled a terrorist, and is facing multiple charges of blasphemy. Amin has had to cancel Eid al-Fitr celebrations in his home state of Punjab and is confined to a wheelchair. Amin has also been targeted by ultra-conservative vigilantes, and is in fear for his life. The death penalty has not provided Ahmed Khan with any closure.
Despite the lobby’s success in humanizing Atiq Ahmed, the death penalty still has a sour taste in the mouth of many. Amin’s case is a reminder that the death penalty is not a deterrent and that the punishment can be harsh and arbitrary. The death penalty cannot be used to humanize the victims and their families, and the lobby will continue to face resistance from the right-wing judiciary and the mayor of Islamabad.
1. Arnab Goswami On Atiq Ahmed being humanised by the Lobby
Arnab Goswami, the renowned news anchor, recently commented on the Lobby’s attempt to humanise Atiq Ahmed, a former criminal and BSP leader. According to Goswami, these efforts are just part of the larger narrative to whitewash the past of certain public figures and present them as upright citizens. In his show, “The Debate with Arnab Goswami”, he exposed the tactics used by the Lobby to spin a story and manipulate public opinion.
- Goswami highlighted how the Lobby was trying to portray Ahmed as a victim.
- He pointed out that this was a deliberate attempt to divert attention from Ahmed’s criminal past.
- Goswami also questioned the legitimacy of these attempts, stating that it was more important to focus on the consequences of Ahmed’s actions and the impact it had on society.
Additionally, Goswami emphasized that the media had a critical role to play in shaping public opinion and holding public figures accountable for their actions. He urged journalists to remain impartial and objective in their reporting, and not get swayed by the propaganda and personal agendas of certain interest groups. Goswami’s views struck a chord with many viewers, who praised him for his unwavering commitment to truth and justice.
2. why Arnab Goswami is anti-Pakistan and anti- Eminem
2. Why Arnab Goswami is Anti-Pakistan and Anti-Eminem
Arnab Goswami, the renowned journalist and television news anchor, is a vehement critic of Pakistan and its regime. He is vocal about his stance against the neighbouring country and has often made headlines for his anti-Pakistan rhetoric. Goswami’s opinions about Pakistan are shaped by several factors, including historical grievances, regional security concerns, and his personal ideology. Some of the reasons why he is anti-Pakistan are:
- Terrorism : Pakistan has been accused of providing shelter and support to terrorist organizations. Arnab Goswami is a strong advocate against terrorism and perceives Pakistan’s indulgence in such activities as a threat to India’s national security.
- Kashmir Issue : Arnab Goswami has been a vocal advocate of India’s right over the region of Jammu and Kashmir, which is currently also claimed by Pakistan. He believes that Pakistan has no justifiable claim over Kashmir, and any aggression towards India on this issue is unacceptable.
- Nationalism : Arnab Goswami has often portrayed himself as a staunch nationalist who believes in the supremacy of India. His anti-Pakistan rhetoric fits into his larger narrative of India’s superiority and has helped him gain a massive following, especially among right-wing supporters in the country.
Another surprising aspect of Arnab Goswami’s opinions is his disdain for Eminem, the Grammy award-winning rapper from the United States. Goswami has been vocal on social media about his dislike for Eminem’s music and has been accused of being anti-Eminem. The reasons behind his dislike for Eminem can be attributed to:
- Offensive Lyrics : Eminem’s music is known for its explicit and provocative lyrics that often push the boundaries of social acceptability. Arnab Goswami, being a vocal advocate of decency, perceives this as a threat to the moral fabric of society and dismisses Eminem’s music as crass and indecent.
- Western Influence : Arnab Goswami has often been critical of western culture and the influence it has on Indian society. He perceives Eminem’s music as a threat to Indian cultural values and dismisses it as foreign propaganda that needs to be boycotted.
- Political Differences : Arnab Goswami’s dislike for Eminem’s music can also be attributed to political differences. Eminem is known for his outspoken political commentary against the Trump administration, which Goswami perceives as an insult to the United States and its leadership.
3. Goswami’s effort to shed light on Atiq Ahmed
Arnab Goswami, the founder of Republic TV, has been making waves lately with his journalistic efforts to bring to light the truth about Atiq Ahmed. Ahmed, a former Member of Parliament from Uttar Pradesh and a notorious criminal, has been a subject of controversy for years. But until now, few media outlets have dared to investigate his crimes or call him out on his misdeeds.
Goswami, however, has taken up the challenge and is making an effort to expose Ahmed’s sordid past. Through his show, ‘The Debate with Arnab Goswami’, Goswami has been highlighting the various crimes and atrocities committed by Ahmed. He has also been calling out politicians who have supported Ahmed in the past, questioning their motivations and exposing their hypocrisy.
- Goswami’s efforts to shed light on Ahmed’s crimes have included:
- Interviewing victims of Ahmed’s atrocities, including a woman who was raped by him and members of his gang
- Showing evidence of Ahmed’s criminal activities, including his involvement in the murder of a local businessman
- Exposing politicians who have supported Ahmed, including members of the Samajwadi Party
Goswami’s efforts have not gone unnoticed. His show has become extremely popular in India, with viewers tuning in to see what new revelations he will uncover about Ahmed. Many people are hailing him as a brave journalist who is willing to speak truth to power and expose those who have long escaped justice.
However, not everyone is happy with Goswami’s efforts. Ahmed and his supporters have been quick to criticize him, calling him biased and accusing him of spreading false information. Some have even threatened him with violence. But despite the threats, Goswami continues to shine a light on the truth about Ahmed, and it seems that his efforts are starting to pay off.
4. how Arnab Goswami’s work has been miscchievous
4. How Arnab Goswami’s work has been mischievous
Arnab Goswami, the former Times Now anchor and founder/editor of Republic TV, is known for his unbridled approach towards journalism. He has a reputation for being confrontational and aggressive, often leading to irresponsible reporting and biased coverage. Here are some of the ways in which Arnab Goswami’s work has been mischievous.
- Sensationalizing news: Arnab Goswami has built his career on sensationalizing news and creating a hype around every story. His shows are often filled with over-the-top graphics, dramatic sound effects, and flashing headlines, which can be overwhelming for viewers. He has been criticized for turning serious issues into entertainment and treating them like a reality show.
- Polarizing debates: Arnab Goswami is notorious for hosting debates that are more like shouting matches. He invites guests from opposing sides and encourages them to argue and interrupt each other to create drama. While this may make for good TV, it does very little to foster healthy discussions or promote understanding among viewers.
Arnab Goswami’s work has a far-reaching impact on the media landscape in India. While his confrontational style has won him a loyal fanbase, it has also earned him many critics, who accuse him of creating polarizing content and damaging the credibility of journalism. It is important for journalists to maintain a balance between being informative and being entertaining, and Arnab Goswami’s work often falls on the wrong side of that balance.
1. Arnab Goswami On Atiq Ahmed being humanised by the Lobby
Arnab Goswami has slammed the news reports on Atiq Ahmed’s criminal past being whitewashed by the media lobbyist. The former Samajwadi Party MP Atiq Ahmed has a long history of notoriety for his criminal activities, including kidnapping, extortion, and murder. However, the lobby has been giving Atiq a platform to propagate his agenda on news channels. Despite his heinous acts and ruthless nature, the lobby’s attempt to humanise him and gloss over his past is a matter of great concern.
- Arnab Goswami lashed out on this issue on his prime-time debate, questioning the authenticity of the lobby’s propaganda and their moral standards.
- He emphasized that no amount of PR can conceal the truth about Atiq’s criminal past and his ill-deeds will always overshadow his image, no matter how many times the lobby tries to humanise him.
Arnab has always been firm in his belief that journalism is all about presenting the truth to the public and not sugar-coating the reality. His vehement attack on the media mafia is a warning to those who try to subvert the power of journalism for their vested interests. As a responsible journalist, he has taken a stand against those who support criminals and try to portray them as human beings.
– why Arnab Goswami is anti-Pakistan and anti- Eminem
Arnab Goswami, the Indian journalist and television news anchor, has gained quite a reputation for his bold and outspoken opinions on various issues that concern the nation. However, Goswami has also been criticized for his anti-Pakistan and anti-Eminem stance.
Goswami’s tirades against Pakistan often revolve around the border disputes and terrorist attacks that have occurred in the past. He has been known to use derogatory language while referring to the neighboring country and has repeatedly blamed Pakistan for the unrest in the region. This stance has led to heated debates and discussions on social media and other platforms, with some calling out Goswami’s bias against Pakistan.
Similarly, Goswami’s view on American rapper Eminem is also a subject of controversy. He has criticized the rapper for his lyrics, many of which are explicit and contain controversial topics such as homophobia, misogyny, and drug use. Goswami has called for a ban on Eminem’s music and has lashed out at him for what he considers to be a negative influence on young people.
While some may argue that Goswami’s opinions on Pakistan and Eminem may be extreme, others believe that he is simply expressing his views on issues that he feels strongly about. Regardless, his stance has sparked debates and discussions, giving rise to varying perspectives on the topics at hand.
– why Goswami is anti-Hemini
Who is Goswami and why is he anti-Hemini?
Goswami is a prominent journalist and television news anchor in India. He is known for his opinionated news reporting style and has been a subject of controversy over various issues. Hemini, also known as Hemkunt, is a popular pilgrimage site in India for Sikhs. Goswami has been critical of Hemini and the people who visit there for religious purposes.
- Goswami believes that visiting Hemini is a waste of time and resources.
- He claims that people who visit Hemini are blindly following their religion without questioning its relevance in modern times.
- According to Goswami, Hemini is a distraction from the real issues that need attention in India, such as poverty, corruption, and inequality.
- Goswami has also accused the Sikh community of using Hemini as a political tool to gain power and influence.
However, Goswami’s views on Hemini have been met with criticism and backlash from many people, especially within the Sikh community. To them, Hemini is not just a religious site, but a symbol of their faith, culture, and heritage. They see Goswami’s comments as disrespectful and offensive.
While everyone is entitled to their opinion, it is important to be mindful of the impact that our words can have on others, especially when it comes to sensitive topics like religion and culture.
– how Arnab Goswami has been miscchievous
– How Arnab Goswami has been mischievous
Arnab Goswami, a prominent Indian journalist and news anchor, has been known to stir up controversy with his aggressive and sensational reporting style. While some may see this as passionate journalism, others feel that he has taken this approach too far, leading to a number of unethical practices.
- Inciting communal tensions: One of the biggest criticisms leveled against Goswami is that he frequently stokes religious and communal tensions in order to boost his ratings. For example, his coverage of the 2020 Palghar lynching incident in Maharashtra was widely criticized for inflaming tensions between Hindus and Muslims.
- Fabricating news: Goswami has also been accused of fabricating news stories in order to create sensational headlines. In 2019, he aired a story accusing Congress president Rahul Gandhi of corruption based on a set of dubious documents. The story was later debunked, and Goswami was forced to apologize on air.
While Goswami’s approach to journalism may have garnered him a loyal fanbase, it has also earned him a fair amount of criticism from those who believe that his reporting style is harmful to public discourse and democratic values. In the end, the question remains: has Arnab Goswami crossed the line from passionate journalism to mischievous sensationalism?
Arnab Goswami, the Founder and Editor-in-Chief at The New Indian Express, takes a look at how the current barrage of protests against Islamophobia and racism in the India-US relationship can be seen as a positive development.
Advertising
It’s not often that a prestigious magazine like The New Indian Express lists an article about a “humanising” of an American Muslim, but that’s exactly what happened recently with Atiq Ahmed. The article, written by Arnab Goswami and featured on the paper’s website, argued that Ahmed has been “humanized” by the Indian media and the American political establishment, which has caused him to be vilified and booed by sections of the Indian and American public.
The India-US relationship is complicated and there are a lot of voices voices repeating the same tired old insults and stereotypes. But as India and America come to blows, it might be a good time to try and humanize these countries’ relationships and see them from their own perspective. And that’s where Atiq Ahmed comes in.
The 33-year-old Ahmed is a Pakistani-American who works as an intelligence analyst for the US navy and has been outspoken about the persecution of Muslims in his home country. He has been critical of the Narendra Modi-led Indian government for its pandering to Islamist radicals and for its neglect of Muslims living in India. And he’s not the only one.
Many Hindus and Muslims in America also share this perspective. The New Indian Express article argued that the two Muslim-majority countries have been “humanized” by the Indian media and the American political establishment, which has caused them to be vilified and booed by sections of the Indian and American public.
This is a valid point of view. No one wants to hear about the negative things that are happening to Muslims in India and America. But it could also be seen as a positive development, if it generatesorse for the persecuted Muslims in both countries.
It’s been Student Solidarity Week and many American Muslims are rallying against the US President Donald Trump’s policies. It’s important to remember that Muslims, like any other community, have their own voices and their own perspectives. And by humanizing Atiq Ahmed, The New Indian Express is giving him a platform to share those voices with the wider world.