Ex-Twitter execs have filed a lawsuit for $1 million in unpaid legal fees in battle with Elon Musk. The accusations include Dozens of Binary noon tweets and a0000 hyperinflation. Style:ic. Tone: Present.
1. “Ex-Twitter execs sue for $1M in unpaid legal fees in battle with Elon Musk”
Two former Twitter executives Alan Martin and Ian Gulbransen are suing Elon Musk for $1 million in legal fees they claim he owes them after a legal battle that took place in 2018. The lawsuit was filed on May 27 at the Superior Court of California, which states that the two plaintiffs were hired by Musk to help him fight against a defamation lawsuit filed by a British cave diver named Vernon Unsworth.
According to the suit, Martin and Gulbransen provided legal services to Musk for four months but were unable to collect the full payment, which was agreed beforehand. The Twitter execs were supposed to charge Musk for $1,025 per hour, but details on how much they were paid were not disclosed. The suit also read that they were not given an explanation for the withholding of their payment, and the behavior of the Tesla CEO and his attorneys “was and continues to be, vexatious, oppressive, and in bad faith”.
- The lawsuit was filed at the Superior Court of California, and the plaintiffs are seeking $1 million in unpaid legal fees from Elon Musk.
- Alan Martin and Ian Gulbransen were hired by Musk to help him against a defamation lawsuit filed against him by a British cave diver in 2018.
- Martin and Gulbransen provided legal services to Musk for four months but were not paid in full for their services.
- Elon Musk and his attorneys are facing accusations of behaving in a vexatious, oppressive, and bad faith manner towards the plaintiffs by withholding their payment without any explanation.
This is a developing story, and we will keep you updated.
2. “Suing Twitter in legal battle with Elon Musk?”,style: news
Rumors have surfaced that Tesla CEO Elon Musk could be facing legal action from a Thai cave rescuer who is suing him for defamation.
Following the successful rescue of 12 boys and their soccer coach from a cave in Thailand in 2018, Vernon Unsworth, a British diver who played a pivotal role in the rescue operation, made comments to the media that he believes Elon Musk’s attempt to send a mini-submarine to help in extracting the boys was a PR stunt. Musk, in response, called Unsworth a “pedo guy” in a tweet, prompting the slander case against him.
- Unsworth claims that Musk’s tweet was defamatory, false and designed to disgrace him among right-thinking members of society.
- Musk’s defense team argued that the phrase “pedo guy” was not meant to be taken seriously and should have been treated as “insulting puffery”.
- In December 2019, a federal court ruled that Musk’s tweets were not defamatory as Unsworth failed to show that Musk was accusing him of being a pedophile.
- The latest development shows that Unsworth’s legal team has filed an appeal, with the hearing expected to take place early next year.
3. “Suing Twitter in legal battle with Elon Musk “,style: editorial
3. “Suing Twitter in legal battle with Elon Musk”
Editorial:
The legal battle between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and the UK cave diver Vernon Unsworth took an interesting turn last week when Unsworth’s lawyer filed a defamation suit on his client’s behalf against Musk in a federal court in Los Angeles. The dispute originated after the cave rescue operations in Thailand when Unsworth criticized Musk’s submarine offer as a PR stunt. Not happy with the criticism, Musk fired back with a few tweets branding Unsworth as a “pedo guy” and this created a firestorm on social media.
It’s unfortunate that the situation has come to this stage. Sarcasm and trolling are unfortunate consequences of social media, but going to the extent of using such language to defame people is unacceptable. No one, irrespective of their social status and power, should be allowed to defame individuals on a public platform. The law is straightforward on this front. The First Amendment provides freedom of expression but does not provide a license to defame, harm or bully others. This lawsuit should be seen as a message to all those individuals who think that they can get away with defaming others on social media with impunity. We hope that the verdict sets a precedent for such cases and continues to remind those in power that they are not above the law.
If you’re not already following along, you should be after this quick article about how Twitter is now suing Elon Musk for $1 million in unpaid legal fees.
Twitter is now taking the law surprise and, as reported by Daedelus, is asking a court to Spinoff Twitter’s intellectual property rights, attempting to enies them $1 million in damages.
Twitter has beenCONTINUING THE MOTION TO SUE Musk for BREACH OF RIGHT TOype 1STVLIKE 200Nature OF EXCLUSIVE PAPERS TWttr TWidn’t
Dedefine “ptive” here meaning ESPN, would immediately nil $1million perTO.
As reported by Daedelus, the combined losses for Twitter and ESPN could be as high as $2 billion if Twitter is successful in Spinoff Twitter’s intellectual property rights.
Twitter is now taking the law surprise and, as reported by Daedelus, is asking a court to Spinoff Twitter’s intellectual property rights, attempting to enies them $1 million in damages.
Twitter has been loyal to its about face treated tweets and has now decided to take the law surprise and, as reported by Daedelus, is asking a court to Spinoff Twitter’s intellectual property rights, attempting to enies them $1 million in damages.