Trump sought to learn the names of jurors who had voted for him during the recently completed election, but was rejected by a judge. The request was made during the course of a trial seeking to blocked!
1. “Judge rejects Trump’s bid to learn juror names at defamation trial”
1. Judge rejects Trump’s bid to learn juror names at defamation trial
The former US President Donald Trump’s wish to learn the names of jurors involved in a defamation case against him has been denied. Judge Lorna G. Schofield rejected Trump’s request stating that identifying the jurors could potentially lead to harassment and could also discourage people from serving as jurors in future cases involving high profile people.
Trump had filed a complaint about a book that claimed he had made deals with foreign entities for political purposes. He received negative publicity regarding this issue and tweeted about the author being a “phony” and a “conman”; this led to the case being brought against him. The author of the book is now suing Trump for defamation. Despite the rejection of Trump’s request, the trial is still scheduled to proceed on its scheduled date.
- Donald Trump’s request to learn the names of jurors in his defamation trial has been denied.
- Judge Lorna G. Schofield stated that it could lead to harassment of jurors and future reluctance of people to serve in similar cases.
- The defamation case was brought against Trump after negative publicity surrounding his controversial dealings with foreign entities.
- The former president had tweeted defaming statements against the author of the book before the case was filed.
- The trial is scheduled to continue on its previously scheduled date.
2. “Trump wants to learn the names of jurors from the start of the trial”
During the trial of former President Donald Trump, the defense team made an unusual request – they asked for the identities of the jurors to be made known. While this is not a common practice, it is not entirely unheard of either. However, in this case, the reasons given for the request made it clear that it was not a benign one.
The defense team argued that knowing the names of the jurors would help them determine bias, and provide a fair trial to their client. However, critics pointed out that this is a highly unusual request and could put the jurors at risk of harassment and intimidation. Moreover, this request is not consistent with past practices, where jurors were always kept anonymous to protect them from outside influence.
- Why is the request unusual?The defense team’s request for juror identities is highly unusual and could put the jurors at risk of harassment and intimidation.
- What were the reasons given for the request? The defense team said that knowing the names of the jurors would help them determine bias and provide a fair trial to their client.
- Were there any critics of the request? Yes, critics pointed out that this request is not consistent with past practices, where jurors were always kept anonymous to protect them from outside influence.
The argument made by the defense team raises serious concerns about the impartiality of the trial, and it is up to the presiding judge to determine whether to grant the request or not. The decision could have far-reaching consequences for future trials and set a precedent for how anonymous jurors are treated in high-profile cases.
In conclusion, the request to reveal the identities of jurors is highly unusual and could put the jurors at risk. However, the defense team’s argument for why they need to know the juror’s identities should be taken into account. Ultimately, it is up to the presiding judge to decide whether to grant the request or not, and the decision made could have far-reaching implications for future trials.
3. “Judge rejects Trump’s bid to learn juror names at defamation trial”
A federal judge in New York has denied Donald Trump’s request to reveal the names of jurors who found him guilty of defamation in 2016.
Trump’s lawyers had argued that the jurors’ identities should be made known so that they could be questioned about potential bias against the former president. However, Judge Lewis Kaplan rejected the request, stating that it could “risk invasions of the jurors’ privacy and unleash a torrent of harassment upon them”. The judge also noted that Trump had failed to provide any evidence of juror misconduct during the trial.
This ruling is the latest blow to Trump’s efforts to overturn the defamation verdict against him.
Trump had been sued by Summer Zervos, a former contestant on his reality TV show “The Apprentice”, who accused him of sexual assault. Trump had denied the allegations and called Zervos a liar, prompting her to file a defamation suit against him. A jury found Trump liable for defamation and awarded Zervos $1 million in damages. Trump has since appealed the verdict, arguing that his statements were protected by the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech. However, the appeal was dismissed by a state court in New York in 2019, and Trump’s subsequent appeal to a federal appeals court was also rejected last year. The case is now set to go to trial to determine the amount of damages that Trump will have to pay to Zervos.
It was all over the world when Trump learned the names of the jurors for his case against lawyer accessible HERE. But that’s not the only reason why the judge has refused to allow him to name them. The president is said to be upset that he was allowed to substitute PleadWee with some other jurors’ names, however the president has refused to step away from the case.